Personally I'm in the second Category, I'll work out a mix that sounds good on CD and then play it, tweak it and plan it until I play the perfect version with almost no mistakes. When you consider that one mistake an hour into the mix will make me start from scratch you can appreciate that this is no mean feat, it usually takes me about 5 hours of testing and practising to get a final version I'm satified with. Sometimes I'll burn this version to CD, listen to it a couple of times and then go back to change a couple of tracks, I want my mixes to stand up to repeated listens and they should stand up to commercially produced mixes. I'd love to have the courage to put out a CD which was recorded live, but typically a live gig is too long or too short, and since you're playing for an audience that's reacting to what you play the track arrangement might be less than perfect for those people who want to listen in cars. As for computer mixed CD's - gimme a break - most of my mixes are designed to work as demos, I've already proven to my managers that I can program computers, I don't need to tell every promoter in the city I do this as well.
Recently I decided that I wanted to update my site more often, so I added a second set of mixes to the site, these are more spontaneous, less planned and no re-recording will be allowed. I'm planning to release a new mix every week and only make it available for a week, this will be in paralel to my more refined demo mixes, in fact some ideas may crossover to find themselves in a demo.
And so.... without further ado - onto the Mixes.
Nowadays most of my mix recording is going into my weekly radio show for kHz Networks - theDMZ aims to cover everything and educate people who're stuck on one kind of music.
Copyright 2003 Scott Manley